Celebrities aren’t just stars on stage and screen—they’re inventors too! From Michael Jackson’s anti-gravity shoes to Hedy Lamarr’s revolutionary technology, discover how famous figures have made their mark in the world of innovation.

Can a metal leg stand on its own as a trademark? In In re Kason, the TTAB rejected Kason Industries' attempt to trademark its telescoping restaurant equipment leg, ruling it was too functional for trademark protection. In this episode, Partner Adam Diament explores the key differences between design patents and trademarks, the legal hurdles of trade dress protection, and why functionality plays a critical role in intellectual property law.

In this episode, host Adam Diament delves into the world of patent claims, focusing on Jepson-style claims. He creatively illustrates the differences between traditional and Jepson-style claims using a hypothetical patent inspired by Carly Rae Jepsen's hit song "Call Me Maybe." The episode highlights the strategic considerations in writing patent claims, particularly the implications of admitting prior art in Jepson-style claims, which are more common in Europe than in the U.S.

Obviousness is a crucial factor in patent law, particularly in biotech. In this episode, host Adam Diament explores Vanda Pharmaceuticals v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, a case that established the reasonable expectation of success standard for determining obviousness.

The ruling invalidated Vanda’s patent for Hetlioz, and when the Supreme Court declined to review the case, the Federal Circuit’s decision became law. What does this mean for future biotech patents? Tune in as Diament breaks down the impact of this ruling and why obviousness remains one of the most challenging issues in patent law.